* Michael R. Hines (mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On 05/19/2015 01:44 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >* Michael R. Hines (mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> >>On 04/20/2015 10:57 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> >>>From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> >>>
> >>>The 'offset' field
On 05/19/2015 01:44 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Michael R. Hines (mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On 04/20/2015 10:57 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
The 'offset' field in RDMACompress and 'current_addr' field
in RDMARegister are commented as
* Michael R. Hines (mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On 04/20/2015 10:57 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> >From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> >
> >The 'offset' field in RDMACompress and 'current_addr' field
> >in RDMARegister are commented as being offsets within a particular
> >RAMBloc
On 04/20/2015 10:57 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
The 'offset' field in RDMACompress and 'current_addr' field
in RDMARegister are commented as being offsets within a particular
RAMBlock, however they appear to actually be offsets within the
ram_addr_t sp