On 17 September 2012 16:28, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Not sure whether this is a gcc bug, but on sparc we wind up
> trying to use std to an unaligned address. The patch does
> work around the problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
As far as the code is concerned:
Reviewed-by: Peter Mayd
On 09/17/2012 08:35 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 September 2012 16:28, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Not sure whether this is a gcc bug, but on sparc we wind up
>> trying to use std to an unaligned address. The patch does
>> work around the problem.
>
> Hmm. I guess this is guest and host havi
On 17 September 2012 16:28, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Not sure whether this is a gcc bug, but on sparc we wind up
> trying to use std to an unaligned address. The patch does
> work around the problem.
Hmm. I guess this is guest and host having differing alignment
requirements for 64 bit types?
