Hi Richard,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> While doing the mechanics of a previous patch set converting
> translators to use to TCGLabel pointers, I was reminded of
> several outstanding OPTME comments in the aarch64 translator.
>
> I had started with the csel change
https://validation.linaro.org/dashboard/streams/anonymous/alex.bennee/bundles/52315b57f77238f924b5528ad16cc549d93a9d31/2a7f8984-0d1c-4268-8249-ba86c56dcbb7/?search=&length=100#table
All passing on the current test set. I've got more to add when I get a chance,
On 20 February 2015 at 16:50, Alex B
It's running through LAVA now:
https://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/268253
On 19 February 2015 at 23:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 20 February 2015 at 06:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> While doing the mechanics of a previous patch set converting
>> translators to use to TCGLabel pointe
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Laurent Desnogues
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> While doing the mechanics of a previous patch set converting
>> translators to use to TCGLabel pointers, I was reminded of
>> several outstanding OPTME comments in the aarch6
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> While doing the mechanics of a previous patch set converting
> translators to use to TCGLabel pointers, I was reminded of
> several outstanding OPTME comments in the aarch64 translator.
>
> I had started with the csel change, which at fi
On 20 February 2015 at 06:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
> While doing the mechanics of a previous patch set converting
> translators to use to TCGLabel pointers, I was reminded of
> several outstanding OPTME comments in the aarch64 translator.
>
> I had started with the csel change, which at first
