On 10/03/2013 09:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/10/2013 15:29, Lei Li ha scritto:
On 10/03/2013 06:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/10/2013 12:28, Lei Li ha scritto:
The load_hook callback is only be called if the RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK is
received.
To check this flags, it means there would be
Il 03/10/2013 15:29, Lei Li ha scritto:
> On 10/03/2013 06:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 03/10/2013 12:28, Lei Li ha scritto:
>>> The load_hook callback is only be called if the RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK is
>>> received.
>>> To check this flags, it means there would be a check action first in
>>> unix
On 10/03/2013 06:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/10/2013 12:28, Lei Li ha scritto:
The load_hook callback is only be called if the RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK is
received.
To check this flags, it means there would be a check action first in
unix_accept_incoming_migration(), like:
f = qemu_fopen_pipe(c
Il 03/10/2013 12:28, Lei Li ha scritto:
>
> The load_hook callback is only be called if the RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK is
> received.
> To check this flags, it means there would be a check action first in
> unix_accept_incoming_migration(), like:
>
> f = qemu_fopen_pipe(c, "rb");
> flags = qemu_get_be64(
On 10/03/2013 04:23 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/10/2013 06:03, Lei Li ha scritto:
Hi Paolo,
When debugging the code, I realized that this problem might still
exist. In the incoming part, it will qemu_fopen_pipe() in
unix_accept_incoming_migration first to enable the load_hook
callback, the c
Il 03/10/2013 06:03, Lei Li ha scritto:
>>>
>
> Hi Paolo,
>
> When debugging the code, I realized that this problem might still
> exist. In the incoming part, it will qemu_fopen_pipe() in
> unix_accept_incoming_migration first to enable the load_hook
> callback, the check action of this RAM_SAVE_
On 09/26/2013 08:44 PM, Lei Li wrote:
On 09/25/2013 11:02 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 25/09/2013 16:32, Lei Li ha scritto:
This RFC patch series tries to introduce a mechanism using side
channel pipe for RAM via SCM_RIGHTS with unix domain socket
protocol migration.
This side channel will be u
Il 26/09/2013 14:44, Lei Li ha scritto:
>>
>> The basis of your code will still be the socket-based QEMUFile, but
>> you'll need your own QEMUFile since you're adding Unix-specific
>> functionality. For this it is not a problem to have two copies the
>> QEMUFile code for sockets, one in savevm.c a
On 09/25/2013 11:02 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 25/09/2013 16:32, Lei Li ha scritto:
This RFC patch series tries to introduce a mechanism using side
channel pipe for RAM via SCM_RIGHTS with unix domain socket
protocol migration.
This side channel will be used for the page flipping by vmsplice,
Il 25/09/2013 16:32, Lei Li ha scritto:
> This RFC patch series tries to introduce a mechanism using side
> channel pipe for RAM via SCM_RIGHTS with unix domain socket
> protocol migration.
>
> This side channel will be used for the page flipping by vmsplice,
> which will be the internal mechanism
10 matches
Mail list logo
