Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 28/01/2015 10:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> I examined the differences between local scans with and without a
>> derived model file for GLib, to gauge what we're missing (the Coverity
>> Scan service we use can't do derived model files). Doesn't look bad,
>> but a fe
On 28/01/2015 10:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> I examined the differences between local scans with and without a
> derived model file for GLib, to gauge what we're missing (the Coverity
> Scan service we use can't do derived model files). Doesn't look bad,
> but a few missed memory leaks caught
