On 05/08/12 14:06, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Most important here is to update our internal endpoint state so we know
> the endpoint isn't in halted state any more. Without this usb-host
> tries to clear halt again with the next data transfer submitted. Doing
> this twice is (a) not correct and (b) c
Looks VERY good, ACK!
The DVD drive works now!
On May 8, 2012 at 2:06 PM Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Most important here is to update our internal endpoint state so we know
> the endpoint isn't in halted state any more. Without this usb-host
> tries to clear halt again with the next data transfer
Looks good, ACK.
On 05/08/2012 02:06 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Most important here is to update our internal endpoint state so we know
the endpoint isn't in halted state any more. Without this usb-host
tries to clear halt again with the next data transfer submitted. Doing
this twice is (a) not
