On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 05:16:56PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 27.05.2011, at 17:13, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:12:12AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On 26.05.2011, at 11:08, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >>> qemu currently returns 0 for rdmsr on invalid MSRs, and
On 27.05.2011, at 17:13, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:12:12AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 26.05.2011, at 11:08, Josh Triplett wrote:
>>> qemu currently returns 0 for rdmsr on invalid MSRs, and ignores wrmsr on
>>> invalid MSRs. Real x86 processors GPF on invalid MSRs,
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:12:12AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 26.05.2011, at 11:08, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > qemu currently returns 0 for rdmsr on invalid MSRs, and ignores wrmsr on
> > invalid MSRs. Real x86 processors GPF on invalid MSRs, which allows
> > software to detect unavailable MS
On 26.05.2011, at 11:08, Josh Triplett wrote:
> qemu currently returns 0 for rdmsr on invalid MSRs, and ignores wrmsr on
> invalid MSRs. Real x86 processors GPF on invalid MSRs, which allows
> software to detect unavailable MSRs. Emulate this behavior correctly in
> qemu.
>
> Bug discovered vi