On 10.02.14 06:12, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 02/08/2014 01:06 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 07.02.2014, at 14:44, Greg Kurz wrote:
In the past, IO space could not be mapped into the memory address space
so we introduced a workaround for that. Nowadays it does not look
necessary so we can
On 02/08/2014 01:06 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 07.02.2014, at 14:44, Greg Kurz wrote:
>
>> In the past, IO space could not be mapped into the memory address space
>> so we introduced a workaround for that. Nowadays it does not look
>> necessary so we can remove the workaround and make sPAP
On 07.02.2014, at 14:44, Greg Kurz wrote:
> In the past, IO space could not be mapped into the memory address space
> so we introduced a workaround for that. Nowadays it does not look
> necessary so we can remove the workaround and make sPAPR PCI
> configuration simplier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gre
On 01/06/2014 10:12 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 09:08:21 +1100
> Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>
>> Please read the rest of this thread. It does not visibly break things but
>> with this patch QEMU starts calling unassigned_mem_accepts() (normally
>> silent) which is not a good sign.
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 09:08:21 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
> Please read the rest of this thread. It does not visibly break things but
> with this patch QEMU starts calling unassigned_mem_accepts() (normally
> silent) which is not a good sign.
>
>
>
Hmm... this is only because this patc
On 03.01.2014 9:09, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 02.01.2014, at 23:08, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/2014 08:04 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11.12.2013, at 07:47, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>
On 12/10/2013 06:47 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:43:05
On 02.01.2014, at 23:08, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 01/03/2014 08:04 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 11.12.2013, at 07:47, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/10/2013 06:47 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:43:05 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 12
On 01/03/2014 08:04 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 11.12.2013, at 07:47, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>> On 12/10/2013 06:47 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
>>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:43:05 +1100
>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 12/10/2013 03:33 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> In the past, IO space c
On 11.12.2013, at 07:47, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 06:47 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:43:05 +1100
>> Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 12/10/2013 03:33 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
In the past, IO space could not be mapped into the memory address space
so
On 12/17/2013 06:52 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:07:58 +1100
> Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>
>> Hm. Nack. This fails:
>>
>> ./qemu-system-ppc64 \
>> -trace "events=qemu_trace_events" \
>> -L "qemu-ppc64-bios/" \
>> -nographic \
>> -vga "none" \
>> -device \
>> virtio-blk-pc
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:07:58 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
> Hm. Nack. This fails:
>
> ./qemu-system-ppc64 \
> -trace "events=qemu_trace_events" \
> -L "qemu-ppc64-bios/" \
> -nographic \
> -vga "none" \
> -device \
> virtio-blk-pci,id=virtioiblk0,drive=drive0,bootindex=20,ioeventfd=
On 12/11/2013 05:47 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 06:47 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:43:05 +1100
>> Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 12/10/2013 03:33 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
In the past, IO space could not be mapped into the memory address space
so we i
On 12/10/2013 06:47 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:43:05 +1100
> Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 12/10/2013 03:33 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
>>> In the past, IO space could not be mapped into the memory address space
>>> so we introduced a workaround for that. Nowadays it does not look
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:43:05 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 03:33 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > In the past, IO space could not be mapped into the memory address space
> > so we introduced a workaround for that. Nowadays it does not look
> > necessary so we can remove the workaround
On 12/10/2013 03:33 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> In the past, IO space could not be mapped into the memory address space
> so we introduced a workaround for that. Nowadays it does not look
> necessary so we can remove the workaround and make sPAPR PCI
> configuration simplier.
>
> This workaround has al
On 07/16/2013 07:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.07.2013 um 10:45 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> :
>
>> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 10:32 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Did I miss anything here?
No, I don't think so. The patch looks good.
>>>
>>> ... and will break all Mac
Am 16.07.2013 um 10:45 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt
:
> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 10:32 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Did I miss anything here?
>>>
>>> No, I don't think so. The patch looks good.
>>
>> ... and will break all Mac targets again, no? Not to speak of non-ppc
>> devices.
>
> D
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 10:32 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> Did I miss anything here?
> >
> > No, I don't think so. The patch looks good.
>
> ... and will break all Mac targets again, no? Not to speak of non-ppc
> devices.
Do you know why it breaks ? Can you suggest what's wrong and how to fi
Am 16.07.2013 um 10:37 schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy :
> On 07/16/2013 06:32 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 16.07.2013 um 08:20 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
>>
>>> Il 16/07/2013 07:19, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
In the past, IO space could not be mapped into the memory address spa
On 07/16/2013 06:32 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.07.2013 um 08:20 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
>
>> Il 16/07/2013 07:19, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>> In the past, IO space could not be mapped into the memory address space
>>> so we introduced a workaround for that. Nowadays it does n
Am 16.07.2013 um 08:20 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
> Il 16/07/2013 07:19, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> In the past, IO space could not be mapped into the memory address space
>> so we introduced a workaround for that. Nowadays it does not look
>> necessary so we can remove the workaround and
Il 16/07/2013 07:19, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
> In the past, IO space could not be mapped into the memory address space
> so we introduced a workaround for that. Nowadays it does not look
> necessary so we can remove the workaround and make sPAPR PCI
> configuration simplier.
>
> This also
On 07/15/2013 04:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 15.07.2013, at 05:24, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>> As it looks like all portio users have migrated to new portio api,
>> the workaround with memory access to io ports routing is no more
>> needed.
>>
>> This also fixes a bug with byte swapp
On 15.07.2013, at 05:24, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> As it looks like all portio users have migrated to new portio api,
> the workaround with memory access to io ports routing is no more
> needed.
>
> This also fixes a bug with byte swapping as the io region was marked
> as little endian while
24 matches
Mail list logo
