> > I have submit a patch into upstream's KVM for supporting
> these features before, and the patch has been applied in kvm-git.
>
> As far as I can see, nothing has been applied to any tree, neither
> qemu.git nor qemu-kvm.git.
Sorry, I have submit to kvm.git, not qemu.git or qemu-kvm.git.
> >
On 2011-05-06 11:37, brill...@viatech.com.cn wrote:
>
>>>
>>> If I want to submit a patch for the qemu-kvm-git, should I
>> use "[QEMU-DEVEL][Patch]..." as the subject? Or there are other rules
>> for qemu-kvm upstream? If yes, would you like to tell me?. Thanks!
>>
>> If you really have to tar
> >
> > If I want to submit a patch for the qemu-kvm-git, should I
> use "[QEMU-DEVEL][Patch]..." as the subject? Or there are other rules
> for qemu-kvm upstream? If yes, would you like to tell me?. Thanks!
>
> If you really have to target qemu-kvm only, then you tagging is fine.
> But this
On 2011-05-06 03:06, brill...@viatech.com.cn wrote:
> Hi, Jan
> Thank you very much for your advice. That's helpful for me.
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the subject's tag (qemu-kvm) is misleading. This is actually targeting
>> the uq/master patch queue, i.e. the upstream kvm staging area.
>>
>
> If I want
Hi, Jan
Thank you very much for your advice. That's helpful for me.
> Hi,
>
> the subject's tag (qemu-kvm) is misleading. This is actually targeting
> the uq/master patch queue, i.e. the upstream kvm staging area.
>
If I want to submit a patch for the qemu-kvm-git, should I use
"[QEMU-D
Hi,
the subject's tag (qemu-kvm) is misleading. This is actually targeting
the uq/master patch queue, i.e. the upstream kvm staging area.
On 2011-05-05 05:03, brill...@viatech.com.cn wrote:
> When KVM is running on VIA CPU with host cpu's model, the feautures of
> VIA CPU will be passed into kvm
