On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 06:35:49PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 20.03.2012 17:10, schrieb Michael Roth:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:09:53PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> Currently, the implementation of that command is full of
> >> Linux specific code. Before any brave man will step i
Am 20.03.2012 17:10, schrieb Michael Roth:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:09:53PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> Currently, the implementation of that command is full of
>> Linux specific code. Before any brave man will step into
>> and port it to other OSes, make this function Linux only.
>>
>> S
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 01:19:25PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:16:41PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > On 20.03.2012 17:10, Michael Roth wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:09:53PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > >> Currently, the implementation of that command
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:16:41PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 20.03.2012 17:10, Michael Roth wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:09:53PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> Currently, the implementation of that command is full of
> >> Linux specific code. Before any brave man will step i
On 20.03.2012 17:10, Michael Roth wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:09:53PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> Currently, the implementation of that command is full of
>> Linux specific code. Before any brave man will step into
>> and port it to other OSes, make this function Linux only.
>>
>> Sig
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:09:53PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Currently, the implementation of that command is full of
> Linux specific code. Before any brave man will step into
> and port it to other OSes, make this function Linux only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik
Which aspect is
