Peter Maydell writes:
> On 3 January 2013 19:00, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Thanks, applied.
>
> So we now say "char device redirected to /dev/pts/5 (compat_monitor0)"
> rather than "char device compat_monitor0 redirected to /dev/pts/5" ?
> I think that's a reduction in clarity and it's sad that
On 3 January 2013 19:00, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Thanks, applied.
So we now say "char device redirected to /dev/pts/5 (compat_monitor0)"
rather than "char device compat_monitor0 redirected to /dev/pts/5" ?
I think that's a reduction in clarity and it's sad that we have to do it.
I also think th
Thanks, applied.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
"Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 02:23:03PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Commit 586502189edf9fd0f89a83de96717a2ea826fdb0 breaks libvirt pty
>> support because it tried to figure the pts name from stderr output.
>>
>> Fix this by moving the label to the end of the line, th
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 02:23:03PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Commit 586502189edf9fd0f89a83de96717a2ea826fdb0 breaks libvirt pty
> support because it tried to figure the pts name from stderr output.
>
> Fix this by moving the label to the end of the line, this way the
> libvirt parser does stil
