On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 07:10:23PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 27.02.2017 19:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 27 February 2017 at 17:57, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> And I still think it does not really make sense to introduce a
> >> per-architecture hook here - let me cite my reply to Peter's mail a
On 27.02.2017 19:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 27 February 2017 at 17:57, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> And I still think it does not really make sense to introduce a
>> per-architecture hook here - let me cite my reply to Peter's mail a
>> couple of mails later in that e-mail thread:
>>
>> 'The -kernel p
On 27 February 2017 at 17:57, Thomas Huth wrote:
> And I still think it does not really make sense to introduce a
> per-architecture hook here - let me cite my reply to Peter's mail a
> couple of mails later in that e-mail thread:
>
> 'The -kernel parameter is not just only dependent on the target
On 27.02.2017 15:00, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:43:23PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 25.01.2017 09:40, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> We can have basic support for the "-kernel" parameter quite easily
>>> by using the generic loader device. This should be enough for most
>>> boa
On 27 February 2017 at 17:49, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 27.02.2017 14:16, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>> Why do we need the "-kernel" parameter for the null-machine? I mean -
>> what are the use cases?
>
> Since it is now possible to instantiate a CPU and memory with the
> null-machine, you can use it a
On 27.02.2017 14:16, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 02/27/2017 01:43 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 25.01.2017 09:40, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> We can have basic support for the "-kernel" parameter quite easily
>>> by using the generic loader device. This should be enough for most
>>> boards which do not
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:43:23PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 25.01.2017 09:40, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > We can have basic support for the "-kernel" parameter quite easily
> > by using the generic loader device. This should be enough for most
> > boards which do not need special machine-specific
On 02/27/2017 01:43 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 25.01.2017 09:40, Thomas Huth wrote:
We can have basic support for the "-kernel" parameter quite easily
by using the generic loader device. This should be enough for most
boards which do not need special machine-specific magic for loading
a kernel (a
On 25.01.2017 09:40, Thomas Huth wrote:
> We can have basic support for the "-kernel" parameter quite easily
> by using the generic loader device. This should be enough for most
> boards which do not need special machine-specific magic for loading
> a kernel (and for those that need special magic,
On 25.01.2017 15:42, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 25/01/2017 à 09:40, Thomas Huth a écrit :
>> We can have basic support for the "-kernel" parameter quite easily
>> by using the generic loader device. This should be enough for most
>> boards which do not need special machine-specific magic for loadin
Le 25/01/2017 à 09:40, Thomas Huth a écrit :
> We can have basic support for the "-kernel" parameter quite easily
> by using the generic loader device. This should be enough for most
> boards which do not need special machine-specific magic for loading
> a kernel (and for those that need special ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
