On 10 February 2016 at 22:40, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 February 2016 at 14:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
>> check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first
>> bit and the number of bits. Fix this in c
On 10/02/2016 23:40, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 February 2016 at 14:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
>> check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first
>> bit and the number of bits. Fix this in cpu_physi
On 10 February 2016 at 14:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
> check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first
> bit and the number of bits. Fix this in cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty
> and cpu_physical_memory_al
On 10.02.2016 15:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
> check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first
> bit and the number of bits. Fix this in cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty
> and cpu_physical_memory_all_dirty.
On 10/02/16 14:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
> check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first
> bit and the number of bits. Fix this in cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty
> and cpu_physical_memory_all_dirty. Th
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
> check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first
> bit and the number of bits. Fix this in cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty
> and cpu_physica