Am 25.07.2013 16:46, schrieb Andreas Färber:
> Am 25.07.2013 12:14, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:01:15PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> New msr_* fields would be candidates for X86CPU, but there's already one
>>> in CPUX86State. :/
>>>
>> Is this NAK?
>
> No, it was more a
Am 25.07.2013 12:14, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:01:15PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 24.07.2013 16:37, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>>> This requires kernel 3.10 but it is otherwise quite simple to do.
>>> The kernel pays attention to MSRs writes that are host initiated, and
Il 25/07/2013 12:14, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:01:15PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 24.07.2013 16:37, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>>> This requires kernel 3.10 but it is otherwise quite simple to do.
>>> The kernel pays attention to MSRs writes that are host initiated,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:01:15PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 24.07.2013 16:37, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> > This requires kernel 3.10 but it is otherwise quite simple to do.
> > The kernel pays attention to MSRs writes that are host initiated, and
> > disables all side effects of the PMU regi
Am 24.07.2013 16:37, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> This requires kernel 3.10 but it is otherwise quite simple to do.
> The kernel pays attention to MSRs writes that are host initiated, and
> disables all side effects of the PMU registers (e.g. the global status
> MSR can be written and global overflow c
