On 09/10/2015 10:15, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > I did it about six months ago. Sorry for not digging up the results
> > when posting:
> >
> > baseline: 193 kiops
> > tcmalloc: 202 kiops
> > tcmalloc + G_SLICE=always-malloc: 210 kiops
>
> Thanks. Do you have numbers for g_malloc + G_SLICE=always-mal
On 08/10/2015 11:41, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 08.10.2015 um 10:54 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Simplify memory allocation by sticking with a single API. GSlice
>>> is not that fast anyway (tcmalloc/jemalloc are better).
>>>
Am 09.10.2015 um 09:49 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 08/10/2015 11:41, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 08.10.2015 um 10:54 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> >> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>> Simplify memory allocation by sticking with a single API. GSlice
> >>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Simplify memory allocation by sticking with a single API. GSlice
> is not that fast anyway (tcmalloc/jemalloc are better).
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> block/io.c| 4 ++--
> block/mirror.c| 4 ++--
>
