Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ahci: Fix non-NCQ accesses for LBA > 16bits

2011-05-24 Thread Alexander Graf
On 25.05.2011, at 00:46, Alexander Graf wrote: > AHCI provides two ways of reading/writing data: > > 1) NCQ > 2) ATA commands with the LBA in the command FIS > > In the second code path, we didn't handle any LBAs that were bigger than > 16 bits, so whenever a guest that used high LBA numbers wa

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ahci: Fix non-NCQ accesses for LBA > 16bits

2011-05-19 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 19.05.2011 11:57, schrieb Alexander Graf: > AHCI provides two ways of reading/writing data: > > 1) NCQ > 2) ATA commands with the LBA in the command FIS > > In the second code path, we didn't handle any LBAs that were bigger than > 16 bits, so whenever a guest that used high LBA numbers want

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ahci: Fix non-NCQ accesses for LBA > 16bits

2011-05-18 Thread Alexander Graf
On 18.05.2011, at 21:16, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-05-18 14:48, Alexander Graf wrote: >> AHCI provides two ways of reading/writing data: >> >> 1) NCQ >> 2) ATA commands with the LBA in the command FIS >> >> In the second code path, we didn't handle any LBAs that were bigger than >> 16 bits, s

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ahci: Fix non-NCQ accesses for LBA > 16bits

2011-05-18 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2011-05-18 14:48, Alexander Graf wrote: > AHCI provides two ways of reading/writing data: > > 1) NCQ > 2) ATA commands with the LBA in the command FIS > > In the second code path, we didn't handle any LBAs that were bigger than > 16 bits, so whenever a guest that used high LBA numbers wanted