Am 16.07.2013 um 14:30 hat Andreas Färber geschrieben:
> Am 15.07.2013 11:34, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> > AHCI couldn't cope with asynchronous commands that aren't doing DMA, it
> > simply wouldn't complete them. Due to the bug fixed in commit f68ec837,
> > FLUSH commands would seem to have completed i
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:34:31AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> AHCI couldn't cope with asynchronous commands that aren't doing DMA, it
> simply wouldn't complete them. Due to the bug fixed in commit f68ec837,
> FLUSH commands would seem to have completed immediately even if they
> were still running
Am 15.07.2013 11:34, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> AHCI couldn't cope with asynchronous commands that aren't doing DMA, it
> simply wouldn't complete them. Due to the bug fixed in commit f68ec837,
> FLUSH commands would seem to have completed immediately even if they
> were still running on the host. After
On Mon, 07/15 11:34, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> AHCI couldn't cope with asynchronous commands that aren't doing DMA, it
> simply wouldn't complete them. Due to the bug fixed in commit f68ec837,
> FLUSH commands would seem to have completed immediately even if they
> were still running on the host. After t
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 11:34 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> AHCI couldn't cope with asynchronous commands that aren't doing DMA, it
> simply wouldn't complete them. Due to the bug fixed in commit f68ec837,
> FLUSH commands would seem to have completed immediately even if they
> were still running on the
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:34:31AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> AHCI couldn't cope with asynchronous commands that aren't doing DMA, it
> simply wouldn't complete them. Due to the bug fixed in commit f68ec837,
> FLUSH commands would seem to have completed immediately even if they
> were still running
