* Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-07 18:35]:
> A few more remarks :
>
> - tpm_register() must be called in hw/pc.c.
>
> - you must also handle incomplete write and reads. Use something like
> unix_write() in vl.c and the equivalent for read.
>
> - The code seems to be Unix specific
A few more remarks :
- tpm_register() must be called in hw/pc.c.
- you must also handle incomplete write and reads. Use something like
unix_write() in vl.c and the equivalent for read.
- The code seems to be Unix specific so it must be disabled for win32.
Regards,
Fabrice.
* Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-06 20:47]:
> Thomas Bleher wrote:
> > * Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-05 16:40]:
> >> Thomas Bleher wrote:
> > +result = write(s->tpm_fd, s->send_data, s->send_data_index);
> > +if (result < s->send_data_index) {
> > +
Thomas Bleher wrote:
> * Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-05 16:40]:
>> Thomas Bleher wrote:
>>> Thiemo Seufer told me that GPLv2 is fine for qemu, therefore I'd like to
>>> ask that this patch be included in qemu as I posted it (the second
>>> version with the clarified GPLv2 license).
* Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-05 16:40]:
> Thomas Bleher wrote:
>> Thiemo Seufer told me that GPLv2 is fine for qemu, therefore I'd like to
>> ask that this patch be included in qemu as I posted it (the second
>> version with the clarified GPLv2 license).
>
> I prefer that a BSD st
Thomas Bleher wrote:
Thiemo Seufer told me that GPLv2 is fine for qemu, therefore I'd like to
ask that this patch be included in qemu as I posted it (the second
version with the clarified GPLv2 license).
I prefer that a BSD style license is used, especially if the code just
contains wrappers.
* Thomas Bleher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-01 16:55]:
> * Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-31 17:14]:
> > Thomas Bleher wrote:
> > > * Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-31 13:54]:
> > > > Thomas Bleher wrote:
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/hw/tpm.c
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1
* Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-31 17:14]:
> Thomas Bleher wrote:
> > * Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-31 13:54]:
> > > Thomas Bleher wrote:
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/hw/tpm.c
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * TPM emulation
> > > > + * Written by T
Thomas Bleher wrote:
> This patch adds support for an Atmel TPM chip.
>
> Background: TPMs are rather complex chips, supporting many commands and
> implementing complex crypto protocols like Direct Anonymous Attestation
> (DAA). Therefore, this patch does not directly implement a TPM chip, but
> i
This patch adds support for an Atmel TPM chip.
Background: TPMs are rather complex chips, supporting many commands and
implementing complex crypto protocols like Direct Anonymous Attestation
(DAA). Therefore, this patch does not directly implement a TPM chip, but
instead utilizes the TPM emulator
Thomas Bleher wrote:
> This patch adds support for an Atmel TPM chip.
>
> Background: TPMs are rather complex chips, supporting many commands and
> implementing complex crypto protocols like Direct Anonymous Attestation
> (DAA). Therefore, this patch does not directly implement a TPM chip, but
> i
11 matches
Mail list logo
