On 12/05/2021 16.00, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 12/05/2021 15.40, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 12/05/2021 13.53, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 5/10/21 9:35 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
Clang unfortunately does not support generating code for the z900
architecture level and starts with the z10 instead. Thus t
On 5/12/21 1:53 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 5/10/21 9:35 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> Clang unfortunately does not support generating code for the z900
>> architecture level and starts with the z10 instead. Thus to be able
>> to support compiling with Clang, we have to check for the support
On 12/05/2021 15.40, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 12/05/2021 13.53, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 5/10/21 9:35 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
Clang unfortunately does not support generating code for the z900
architecture level and starts with the z10 instead. Thus to be able
to support compiling with Clang
On 12/05/2021 13.53, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 5/10/21 9:35 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
Clang unfortunately does not support generating code for the z900
architecture level and starts with the z10 instead. Thus to be able
to support compiling with Clang, we have to check for the supported
comp
On 5/10/21 9:35 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Clang unfortunately does not support generating code for the z900
> architecture level and starts with the z10 instead. Thus to be able
> to support compiling with Clang, we have to check for the supported
> compiler flags. The disadvantage is of course that