On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 21:31:47 +0530
Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
> On 7/7/23 17:52, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/7/23 08:59, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel and Shiva !
> >>
> >> On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 08:09:47 -0300
> >> Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> >>
> >>> This one was a buzzer
On Sat Jul 8, 2023 at 2:10 AM AEST, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
>
> On 7/7/23 19:54, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > On 7/7/23 13:59, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel and Shiva !
> >>
> >> On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 08:09:47 -0300
> >> Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> >>
> >>> This one was a buzzer shot.
> >>>
>
On 7/7/23 19:54, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 7/7/23 13:59, Greg Kurz wrote:
Hi Daniel and Shiva !
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 08:09:47 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
This one was a buzzer shot.
Indeed ! :-) I would have appreciated some more time to re-assess
my R-b tag on this 2 year old b
On 7/7/23 17:52, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 7/7/23 08:59, Greg Kurz wrote:
Hi Daniel and Shiva !
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 08:09:47 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
This one was a buzzer shot.
Indeed ! :-) I would have appreciated some more time to re-assess
my R-b tag on this 2 yea
On 7/7/23 11:24, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 7/7/23 13:59, Greg Kurz wrote:
Hi Daniel and Shiva !
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 08:09:47 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
This one was a buzzer shot.
Indeed ! :-) I would have appreciated some more time to re-assess
my R-b tag on this 2 year old
On 7/7/23 13:59, Greg Kurz wrote:
Hi Daniel and Shiva !
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 08:09:47 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
This one was a buzzer shot.
Indeed ! :-) I would have appreciated some more time to re-assess
my R-b tag on this 2 year old bug though ;-)
We should drop that patch IM
On 7/7/23 08:59, Greg Kurz wrote:
Hi Daniel and Shiva !
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 08:09:47 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
This one was a buzzer shot.
Indeed ! :-) I would have appreciated some more time to re-assess
my R-b tag on this 2 year old bug though ;-)
My bad! I never thought i
Hi Daniel and Shiva !
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 08:09:47 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> This one was a buzzer shot.
>
Indeed ! :-) I would have appreciated some more time to re-assess
my R-b tag on this 2 year old bug though ;-)
My concerns were that the DAWR1 spapr cap was still not enabled
This one was a buzzer shot.
Queued in gitlab.com/danielhb/qemu/tree/ppc-next. Thanks,
Daniel
On 7/7/23 05:47, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
From: Ravi Bangoria
As per the PAPR, bit 0 of byte 64 in pa-features property
indicates availability of 2nd DAWR registers. i.e. If this bit is set, 2nd
