Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] VIRTIO-IOMMU probe request support and MSI bypass on ARM

2020-06-26 Thread Jean-Philippe Brucker
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:47:59AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 03:26:20PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > > By default the virtio-iommu translates MSI transactions. This > > behavior is inherited from ARM SMMU. However the virt machine > > code knows where the MSI doorbell

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] VIRTIO-IOMMU probe request support and MSI bypass on ARM

2020-06-25 Thread Peter Maydell
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 16:16, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Virtio bits look OK: > > Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin I can take it via the arm tree once it's ready. I had a comment on patch 5 and it looks like Markus had a question about patch 2, though. thanks -- PMM

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] VIRTIO-IOMMU probe request support and MSI bypass on ARM

2020-06-24 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 03:26:20PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > By default the virtio-iommu translates MSI transactions. This > behavior is inherited from ARM SMMU. However the virt machine > code knows where the MSI doorbells are, so we can easily > declare those regions as VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_M

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] VIRTIO-IOMMU probe request support and MSI bypass on ARM

2020-06-24 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 03:26:20PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > By default the virtio-iommu translates MSI transactions. This > behavior is inherited from ARM SMMU. However the virt machine > code knows where the MSI doorbells are, so we can easily > declare those regions as VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_M