On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 4:19 AM Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> Am 02.02.2022 um 20:08 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> > > I guess the relevant question in the context of this patch is whether
> > > sync.py will need a similar two-phase setup as legacy.py. Do you think
> > > you can do without it when you have
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 4:38 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 02:08:59PM -0500, John Snow wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 2:46 PM Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 01.02.2022 um 19:32 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 8:21 AM Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 02:08:59PM -0500, John Snow wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 2:46 PM Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >
> > Am 01.02.2022 um 19:32 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 8:21 AM Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Am 01.02.2022 um 05:11 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> > > >
Am 02.02.2022 um 20:08 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> > I guess the relevant question in the context of this patch is whether
> > sync.py will need a similar two-phase setup as legacy.py. Do you think
> > you can do without it when you have to reintroduce this behaviour here
> > to fix bugs?
> >
>
>
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 2:46 PM Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> Am 01.02.2022 um 19:32 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 8:21 AM Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 01.02.2022 um 05:11 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> > > > The synchronous QMP library would bind to the server address during
> >
Am 01.02.2022 um 19:32 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 8:21 AM Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >
> > Am 01.02.2022 um 05:11 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> > > The synchronous QMP library would bind to the server address during
> > > __init__(). The new library delays this to the accept() cal
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 8:21 AM Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> Am 01.02.2022 um 05:11 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> > The synchronous QMP library would bind to the server address during
> > __init__(). The new library delays this to the accept() call, because
> > binding occurs inside of the call to start_[u
Am 01.02.2022 um 05:11 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> The synchronous QMP library would bind to the server address during
> __init__(). The new library delays this to the accept() call, because
> binding occurs inside of the call to start_[unix_]server(), which is an
> async method -- so it cannot ha