On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 02:29, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> This is part of a reorganization to the set of mmu_idx.
> The Secure regimes all have a single stage translation;
> there is no point in pointing out that the idx is for stage1.
...until we do support secure EL2, and then there might
be a
Richard Henderson writes:
> This is part of a reorganization to the set of mmu_idx.
> The Secure regimes all have a single stage translation;
> there is no point in pointing out that the idx is for stage1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée
> ---
> target/arm/cpu
