Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 09:23:48PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 23/05/2022 15.45, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> > Thomas Huth writes:
>> >
>> > > The "-display sdl" option still uses a hand-crafted parser for its
>> > > parameters since we didn't want to drag an in
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 09:23:48PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 23/05/2022 15.45, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Thomas Huth writes:
> >
> > > The "-display sdl" option still uses a hand-crafted parser for its
> > > parameters since we didn't want to drag an interface we considered
> > > somewhat
On 23/05/2022 15.45, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Thomas Huth writes:
The "-display sdl" option still uses a hand-crafted parser for its
parameters since we didn't want to drag an interface we considered
somewhat flawed into the QAPI schema. Since the flaws are gone now,
it's time to QAPIfy.
This
Thomas Huth writes:
> The "-display sdl" option still uses a hand-crafted parser for its
> parameters since we didn't want to drag an interface we considered
> somewhat flawed into the QAPI schema. Since the flaws are gone now,
> it's time to QAPIfy.
>
> This introduces the new "DisplaySDL" QAPI
