On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 at 16:13, wrote:
>
> From: Francesco Cagnin
>
> Support is added for single-stepping, software breakpoints, hardware
> breakpoints and watchpoints. The code has been structured like the KVM
> counterpart (and many parts are basically identical).
>
> Guests can be debugged thro
> Are you running the Linux guest on multiple cores? If yes, could you
> check if the issue persists also when using a single core?
Yes, I was running with 2 cores. I just tested with 1 and 2 several times. I
haven't reproduced the bug with 1 core, but happens around 70% of the time with
2 cores
Are you running the Linux guest on multiple cores? If yes, could you
check if the issue persists also when using a single core?
Thanks,
--
Francesco
> It seems v3 has a regression in regards to BRK instructions that I cannot
> reproduce with v2.
I've now observed the same messages on v2 on a co-worker's computer. Maybe it's
happening in combination with another commit on master. If I can find the time,
I'll try to bisect it.
—
Mads Ynddal
> On 14 Jan 2023, at 17.13, francesco.cag...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> From: Francesco Cagnin
>
> Support is added for single-stepping, software breakpoints, hardware
> breakpoints and watchpoints. The code has been structured like the KVM
> counterpart (and many parts are basically identical).
>