On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 12:14:53PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> (adding Fabiano to the thread)
>
> On 2/10/23 16:35, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:32:01PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> >> Hello Daniel and all,
> >>
> >> resurrecting this series from end of last year
(adding Fabiano to the thread)
On 2/10/23 16:35, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:32:01PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> Hello Daniel and all,
>>
>> resurrecting this series from end of last year,
>>
>> do we think that this is the right approach and first step to
>> be abl
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:32:01PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> Hello Daniel and all,
>
> resurrecting this series from end of last year,
>
> do we think that this is the right approach and first step to
> be able to provide good performance for virsh save and virsh
> restore?
I've looked thr
Hello Daniel and all,
resurrecting this series from end of last year,
do we think that this is the right approach and first step to be able to
provide good performance for virsh save and virsh restore?
For reference, our previous attempt to get the performance for our use case
(libvirt + qemu
