Le mar. 1 sept. 2020 00:02, Richard Henderson
a écrit :
> On 8/31/20 2:18 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 8/19/20 11:28 AM, Robert Foley wrote:
> >> Adding ->do_interrupt_locked to ARMCPUClass is preparation for
> >> pushing the BQL down into the per-arch implementation of ->do_interrupt.
> >
On 8/31/20 2:18 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 8/19/20 11:28 AM, Robert Foley wrote:
>> Adding ->do_interrupt_locked to ARMCPUClass is preparation for
>> pushing the BQL down into the per-arch implementation of ->do_interrupt.
>>
>> This is needed since ARM's *_cpu_exec_interrupt calls to *_do_i
On 8/19/20 11:28 AM, Robert Foley wrote:
> Adding ->do_interrupt_locked to ARMCPUClass is preparation for
> pushing the BQL down into the per-arch implementation of ->do_interrupt.
>
> This is needed since ARM's *_cpu_exec_interrupt calls to *_do_interrupt.
> With the push down of the BQL into *_c
