On 12/16/20 2:08 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
We all have our phobias. I find "isinstance(x,
extremely_common_stdlib_type)" to be extremely fragile and likely to
frustrate.
You're applying programming-in-the-large reasoning to a
programming-in-the-small case.
"Surely, they won't use my proof
John Snow writes:
> On 11/16/20 5:12 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> This replaces _make_tree with Annotated(). By creating it as a generic
>>> container, we can more accurately describe the exact nature of this
>>> particular value. i.e., each Annotated object is actua
On 11/16/20 5:12 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
This replaces _make_tree with Annotated(). By creating it as a generic
container, we can more accurately describe the exact nature of this
particular value. i.e., each Annotated object is actually an
Annotated, describing its cont
John Snow writes:
> This replaces _make_tree with Annotated(). By creating it as a generic
> container, we can more accurately describe the exact nature of this
> particular value. i.e., each Annotated object is actually an
> Annotated, describing its contained value.
>
> This adds stricter typin
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:42:49PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> This replaces _make_tree with Annotated(). By creating it as a generic
> container, we can more accurately describe the exact nature of this
> particular value. i.e., each Annotated object is actually an
> Annotated, describing its contai
