On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, Philippe Mathieu-Daud? wrote:
> On 1/6/20 11:19 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Finn Thain wrote:
> >
> > > The in_use field is no different to the other words handled using
> > > dp8393x_put() and dp8393x_get(). Use the same technique for in_use
> > > that is u
On 1/6/20 11:19 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Finn Thain wrote:
The in_use field is no different to the other words handled using
dp8393x_put() and dp8393x_get(). Use the same technique for in_use
that is used everywhere else.
Signed-off-by: Finn Thain
---
Changed since v1:
- U
On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Finn Thain wrote:
> The in_use field is no different to the other words handled using
> dp8393x_put() and dp8393x_get(). Use the same technique for in_use
> that is used everywhere else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Finn Thain
> ---
> Changed since v1:
> - Use existing 'address' vari