Het Gala writes:
> Hi, this is just a reminder mail to check if Daniel has plan to post v3
> patches in the coming days. Would like these patches to get merged in qemu as
> soon as possible, so that we all can focus on restructuring of 'migrate' QAPI
> :)
I just queued v3. Expect a pull requ
On 31/03/23 5:19 pm, Het Gala wrote:
Hi all,
On 17/03/23 9:25 pm, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
Currently it is not possible for a union type to contain a
further union as one (or more) of its branches. This relaxes
that restriction and adds the calls needed to valida
Hi all,
On 17/03/23 9:25 pm, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
Currently it is not possible for a union type to contain a
further union as one (or more) of its branches. This relaxes
that restriction and adds the calls needed to validate field
name uniqueness as unions are f
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> Currently it is not possible for a union type to contain a
> further union as one (or more) of its branches. This relaxes
> that restriction and adds the calls needed to validate field
> name uniqueness as unions are flattened.
I apologize for the long delay. Sick c
