> On May 22, 2025, at 2:52, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:38:10 +0900
> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>
>>> On May 19, 2025, at 21:54, Jonathan Cameron
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 15 May 2025 18:04:18 +0900
>>> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>>>
> On May 13, 2025, at 20:14, Jo
On Wed, 21 May 2025 16:38:10 +0900
Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> > On May 19, 2025, at 21:54, Jonathan Cameron
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 May 2025 18:04:18 +0900
> > Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> >
> >>> On May 13, 2025, at 20:14, Jonathan Cameron
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Add a single complex ca
> On May 19, 2025, at 21:54, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 May 2025 18:04:18 +0900
> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>
>>> On May 13, 2025, at 20:14, Jonathan Cameron
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Add a single complex case for aarch64 virt machine.
>>> Given existing much more comprehensive tests
Jonathan,
> On May 19, 2025, at 21:54, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 May 2025 18:04:18 +0900
> Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>
>>> On May 13, 2025, at 20:14, Jonathan Cameron
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Add a single complex case for aarch64 virt machine.
>>> Given existing much more comprehensiv
On Thu, 15 May 2025 18:04:18 +0900
Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> > On May 13, 2025, at 20:14, Jonathan Cameron
> > wrote:
> >
> > Add a single complex case for aarch64 virt machine.
> > Given existing much more comprehensive tests for x86 cover the
> > common functionality, a single test should be e
> On May 13, 2025, at 20:14, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> Add a single complex case for aarch64 virt machine.
> Given existing much more comprehensive tests for x86 cover the
> common functionality, a single test should be enough to verify
> that the aarch64 part continue to work.
>
> Signe
