On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 6:36 AM Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> Le 19/12/2020 à 19:11, Alistair Francis a écrit :
> > When mapping the host waitid status to the target status we previously
> > just used decoding information in the status value. This doesn't follow
> > what the waitid documentation descr
Le 19/12/2020 à 19:11, Alistair Francis a écrit :
> When mapping the host waitid status to the target status we previously
> just used decoding information in the status value. This doesn't follow
> what the waitid documentation describes, which instead suggests using
> the si_code value for the de
Am Samstag, 19. Dezember 2020, 20:11:13 EET schrieb Alistair Francis:
> When mapping the host waitid status to the target status we previously
> just used decoding information in the status value. This doesn't follow
> what the waitid documentation describes, which instead suggests using
> the si_c
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:11 AM Alistair Francis
wrote:
>
> When mapping the host waitid status to the target status we previously
> just used decoding information in the status value. This doesn't follow
> what the waitid documentation describes, which instead suggests using
> the si_code value
