On 13/11/2023 08.56, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 11/13/23 08:21, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 10/11/2023 09.36, Eric Auger wrote:
Coverity complains about passing "&expected" to "run_range_inverse_array",
which dereferences null "expected". I guess the problem is that the
compare_ranges() loop derefere
On 11/13/23 08:21, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 10/11/2023 09.36, Eric Auger wrote:
Coverity complains about passing "&expected" to "run_range_inverse_array",
which dereferences null "expected". I guess the problem is that the
compare_ranges() loop dereferences 'e' without testing it. However the
loop
On 10/11/2023 09.36, Eric Auger wrote:
Coverity complains about passing "&expected" to "run_range_inverse_array",
which dereferences null "expected". I guess the problem is that the
compare_ranges() loop dereferences 'e' without testing it. However the
loop condition is based on 'ranges' which is
