On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:06 AM Bin Meng wrote:
>
> Cc'ing libSLiRP
I am not sure whether my reply arrived to libSLiRP as I did not
subscribe to that list ...
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 12:09 AM Peter Maydell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 at 14:53, Bin Meng wrote:
> > >
> >
Cc'ing libSLiRP
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 12:09 AM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 at 14:53, Bin Meng wrote:
> >
> > From: Bin Meng
> >
> > As of today both slirp and tap networking do not pad short frames
> > (e.g.: an ARP packet) to the minimum frame size of 60 bytes.
> >
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 at 14:53, Bin Meng wrote:
>
> From: Bin Meng
>
> As of today both slirp and tap networking do not pad short frames
> (e.g.: an ARP packet) to the minimum frame size of 60 bytes.
>
> If eTSEC is programmed to reject short frames, ARP requests will be
> dropped, preventing the gu
