On 2/28/22 03:36, Peter Maydell wrote:
I think we should have the 128-bit atomics check in meson.build
look the same as the existing one for 64-bit atomics, though,
unless there's a reason why they should look different.
For the 64-bit version we explicitly pass __ATOMIC_RELAXED,
and we use __ato
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:28, Marc-André Lureau
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 5:24 PM Peter Maydell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 12:19, wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Marc-André Lureau
> > >
> > > testfile.c: In function 'main':
> > > testfile.c:5:11: error: incorrect number o
Hi
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 5:24 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 12:19, wrote:
> >
> > From: Marc-André Lureau
> >
> > testfile.c: In function 'main':
> > testfile.c:5:11: error: incorrect number of arguments to function
> > '__atomic_load'
> > 5 | y = __atomic_load
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 12:19, wrote:
>
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> testfile.c: In function 'main':
> testfile.c:5:11: error: incorrect number of arguments to function
> '__atomic_load'
> 5 | y = __atomic_load(&x, 0);
> | ^
> testfile.c:6:7: error: argument
On 28/2/22 13:07, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Marc-André Lureau
testfile.c: In function 'main':
testfile.c:5:11: error: incorrect number of arguments to function
'__atomic_load'
5 | y = __atomic_load(&x, 0);
| ^
testfile.c:6:7: error: argume
