Am 23.11.2022 um 18:04 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 11/23/22 14:45, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > I think this means that if we clean up everything, in the end we'll have
> > coroutine_wrapper and coroutine_wrapper_bdrv (the fourth version not in
> > the above list, but that Paolo mentioned we may w
On 11/23/22 14:45, Kevin Wolf wrote:
I think this means that if we clean up everything, in the end we'll have
coroutine_wrapper and coroutine_wrapper_bdrv (the fourth version not in
the above list, but that Paolo mentioned we may want to have).
Yes, I agree.
The only thing I'm unsure about is
Am 23.11.2022 um 12:45 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben:
>
>
> Am 18/11/2022 um 11:57 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> > On 11/16/22 15:07, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> >> Here we introduce generated_co_wrapper_simple, a simplification of
> >> g_c_w that
> >> only considers the case wher
Am 18/11/2022 um 11:57 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> On 11/16/22 15:07, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>> Here we introduce generated_co_wrapper_simple, a simplification of
>> g_c_w that
>> only considers the case where the caller is not in a coroutine.
>> This simplifies and clarifies a lot when
Ok, as I expected simple changes in a previous based-on serie provoke a
cascade of changes that inevitably affect these patches too.
While I strongly suggest to have an initial look at these patches
because it gives an idea on what am I trying to accomplish, I would not
go looking at nitpicks and
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 4:01 PM Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
wrote:
> > - generated_co_wrapper_simple -> coroutine_wrapper
> > - generated_co_wrapper_blk -> coroutine_wrapper_mixed
> > - generated_co_wrapper -> coroutine_wrapper_mixed_bdrv
> >
> > ? It is not clear to me yet if you will have bdrv_*
Am 18/11/2022 um 11:57 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> On 11/16/22 15:07, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>> Here we introduce generated_co_wrapper_simple, a simplification of
>> g_c_w that
>> only considers the case where the caller is not in a coroutine.
>> This simplifies and clarifies a lot when
On 11/16/22 15:07, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Here we introduce generated_co_wrapper_simple, a simplification of g_c_w that
only considers the case where the caller is not in a coroutine.
This simplifies and clarifies a lot when the caller is a coroutine or not, and
in the future will hope
