Re: [PATCH 0/2] audio/jackaudio: avoid dynamic stack allocations

2023-09-18 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 03:19:08PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > Hi Gerd; this series has been reviewed. Did you want to take it > via the audio tree? Or I can put it in via target-arm.next > if you prefer. arm tree is fine with me. take care, Gerd

Re: [PATCH 0/2] audio/jackaudio: avoid dynamic stack allocations

2023-09-12 Thread Peter Maydell
Hi Gerd; this series has been reviewed. Did you want to take it via the audio tree? Or I can put it in via target-arm.next if you prefer. thanks -- PMM On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 16:58, Peter Maydell wrote: > > This patchset removes two variable length arrays from the jack audio > backend. The code

Re: [PATCH 0/2] audio/jackaudio: avoid dynamic stack allocations

2023-08-21 Thread Marc-André Lureau
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 7:59 PM Peter Maydell wrote: > > This patchset removes two variable length arrays from the jack audio > backend. The codebase has very few VLAs, and if we can get rid of > them all we can make the compiler error on new additions. This is a > defensive measure against secu