On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 02:06:57PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> On 11/14/22 20:08, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
> > I've been using this patch for a long time so that I don't have to use
> > dd to zero-extend stuff all the time. It's just doing what people are
> > doing already, ri
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:48:40AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 19:08, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
> >
> > I've been using this patch for a long time so that I don't have to use
> > dd to zero-extend stuff all the time. It's just doing what people are
> > doing already, right?
On 11/15/22 15:06, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 15/11/22 14:06, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Hello Peter,
On 11/14/22 20:08, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
I've been using this patch for a long time so that I don't have to use
dd to zero-extend stuff all the time. It's just doing what people are
doing
On 15/11/22 14:06, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Hello Peter,
On 11/14/22 20:08, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
I've been using this patch for a long time so that I don't have to use
dd to zero-extend stuff all the time. It's just doing what people are
doing already, right? I hope it's not controversial.
Hello Peter,
On 11/14/22 20:08, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
I've been using this patch for a long time so that I don't have to use
dd to zero-extend stuff all the time. It's just doing what people are
doing already, right? I hope it's not controversial.
I simply run :
truncate --size
on the
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 19:08, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
>
> I've been using this patch for a long time so that I don't have to use
> dd to zero-extend stuff all the time. It's just doing what people are
> doing already, right? I hope it's not controversial.
We just had a thread about this kind of t
