Re: [PATCH] tcg/arm: Increase stack alignment for function generation

2021-09-03 Thread Richard Henderson
On 9/1/21 8:41 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 19:30, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 07:18:03PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 18:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: This avoids the following assertion when the kernel initializes X.509 certi

Re: [PATCH] tcg/arm: Increase stack alignment for function generation

2021-09-02 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 08:36:56AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 21:24, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:17:07PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 19:51, Richard W.M. Jones > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021

Re: [PATCH] tcg/arm: Increase stack alignment for function generation

2021-09-02 Thread Peter Maydell
On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 21:24, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:17:07PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 19:51, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 07:41:21PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > Is the failure case short enoug

Re: [PATCH] tcg/arm: Increase stack alignment for function generation

2021-09-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:17:07PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 19:51, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 07:41:21PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > Is the failure case short enough to allow -d ... logging to > > > be taken? That's usually the most

Re: [PATCH] tcg/arm: Increase stack alignment for function generation

2021-09-01 Thread Peter Maydell
On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 19:51, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 07:41:21PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > Is the failure case short enough to allow -d ... logging to > > be taken? That's usually the most useful info, but it's so huge > > it's often not feasible. > > I can try

Re: [PATCH] tcg/arm: Increase stack alignment for function generation

2021-09-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 07:41:21PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > Is the failure case short enough to allow -d ... logging to > be taken? That's usually the most useful info, but it's so huge > it's often not feasible. I can try -- what exact -d option would be useful? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Vi

Re: [PATCH] tcg/arm: Increase stack alignment for function generation

2021-09-01 Thread Peter Maydell
On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 19:30, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 07:18:03PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 18:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > This avoids the following assertion when the kernel initializes X.509 > > > certificates: > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] tcg/arm: Increase stack alignment for function generation

2021-09-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 07:18:03PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 18:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > This avoids the following assertion when the kernel initializes X.509 > > certificates: > > > > [7.315373] Loading compiled-in X.509 certificates > > qemu-system-arm

Re: [PATCH] tcg/arm: Increase stack alignment for function generation

2021-09-01 Thread Peter Maydell
On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 18:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > This avoids the following assertion when the kernel initializes X.509 > certificates: > > [7.315373] Loading compiled-in X.509 certificates > qemu-system-arm: ../tcg/tcg.c:3063: temp_allocate_frame: Assertion `align <= > TCG_TARGET_S