Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Use qemu_madvise

2022-03-22 Thread Andrew Deason
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:58:19 + "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote: > * Andrew Deason (adea...@sinenomine.net) wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:53:05 + > > "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote: > > > > > * Andrew Deason (adea...@sinenomine.net) wrote: > > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:41:41 +0100 >

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Use qemu_madvise

2022-03-22 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Andrew Deason (adea...@sinenomine.net) wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:53:05 + > "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote: > > > * Andrew Deason (adea...@sinenomine.net) wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:41:41 +0100 > > > David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > > > > > On 16.03.22 10:37, Dr. David Alan Gi

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Use qemu_madvise

2022-03-22 Thread Andrew Deason
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:53:05 + "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote: > * Andrew Deason (adea...@sinenomine.net) wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:41:41 +0100 > > David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > > > On 16.03.22 10:37, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > > > * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org)

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Use qemu_madvise

2022-03-22 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Andrew Deason (adea...@sinenomine.net) wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:41:41 +0100 > David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 16.03.22 10:37, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > > * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote: > > >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 07:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > >>> > >

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Use qemu_madvise

2022-03-22 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 22.03.22 17:39, Andrew Deason wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:41:41 +0100 > David Hildenbrand wrote: > >> On 16.03.22 10:37, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >>> * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 07:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > On 16.03.22

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Use qemu_madvise

2022-03-22 Thread Andrew Deason
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:41:41 +0100 David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.03.22 10:37, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 07:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >>> > >>> On 16.03.22 05:04, Andrew Deason wrote: > We have a th

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Use qemu_madvise

2022-03-16 Thread Andrew Deason
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:41:41 +0100 David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.03.22 10:37, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 07:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >>> > >>> On 16.03.22 05:04, Andrew Deason wrote: > We have a th

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Use qemu_madvise

2022-03-16 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 16.03.22 10:37, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 07:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> >>> On 16.03.22 05:04, Andrew Deason wrote: We have a thin wrapper around madvise, called qemu_madvise, which provides consis

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Use qemu_madvise

2022-03-16 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 07:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > > On 16.03.22 05:04, Andrew Deason wrote: > > > We have a thin wrapper around madvise, called qemu_madvise, which > > > provides consistent behavior for the !CONFIG_MADVISE case, and wo

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Use qemu_madvise

2022-03-16 Thread Peter Maydell
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 07:53, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > On 16.03.22 05:04, Andrew Deason wrote: > > We have a thin wrapper around madvise, called qemu_madvise, which > > provides consistent behavior for the !CONFIG_MADVISE case, and works > > around some platform-specific quirks (some platforms

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Use qemu_madvise

2022-03-16 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 16.03.22 05:04, Andrew Deason wrote: > We have a thin wrapper around madvise, called qemu_madvise, which > provides consistent behavior for the !CONFIG_MADVISE case, and works > around some platform-specific quirks (some platforms only provide > posix_madvise, and some don't offer all 'advise' t

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Use qemu_madvise

2022-03-15 Thread Peter Xu
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:04:05PM -0500, Andrew Deason wrote: > We have a thin wrapper around madvise, called qemu_madvise, which > provides consistent behavior for the !CONFIG_MADVISE case, and works > around some platform-specific quirks (some platforms only provide > posix_madvise, and some don