On 6/22/20 12:14 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Michal,
On 6/16/20 10:34 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Problem with g_get_host_name() is that on the first call it saves
the hostname into a global variable and from then on, every
subsequent call returns the saved hostname. Even if the hostna
Hi Michal,
On 6/16/20 10:34 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Problem with g_get_host_name() is that on the first call it saves
> the hostname into a global variable and from then on, every
> subsequent call returns the saved hostname. Even if the hostname
> changes. This doesn't play nicely with gues
On 6/19/20 11:54 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 6/16/20 1:34 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
+#ifndef G_OS_WIN32
Nit: positive tests are easier to reason with and extend than negative tests.
I would reverse these two blocks and use a positive test for windows.
Also, CONFIG_WIN32 is what we use e
On 6/16/20 1:34 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> +#ifndef G_OS_WIN32
Nit: positive tests are easier to reason with and extend than negative tests.
I would reverse these two blocks and use a positive test for windows.
Also, CONFIG_WIN32 is what we use elsewhere for this test.
r~
Hi
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:35 PM Michal Privoznik
wrote:
> Problem with g_get_host_name() is that on the first call it saves
> the hostname into a global variable and from then on, every
> subsequent call returns the saved hostname. Even if the hostname
> changes. This doesn't play nicely wit
