Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-27 Thread Alistair Francis
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:20 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > From: Alistair Francis > > We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment from the end of > memory (or 3GB). This means we need at least 16MB of memory to be able > to do this. We don't actually need the FDT to be 16MB aligned,

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-27 Thread Bin Meng
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:20 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > From: Alistair Francis > > We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment from the end of > memory (or 3GB). This means we need at least 16MB of memory to be able > to do this. We don't actually need the FDT to be 16MB aligned,

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-27 Thread Atish Patra
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:21 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > From: Alistair Francis > > We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment from the end of > memory (or 3GB). This means we need at least 16MB of memory to be able > to do this. We don't actually need the FDT to be 16MB aligned,

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-26 Thread Alistair Francis
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 3:45 PM Atish Kumar Patra wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 9:15 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:41 PM Bin Meng wrote: > > > > > > +Atish > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:20 PM Alistair Francis > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Alistair

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-22 Thread Atish Kumar Patra
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 9:15 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:41 PM Bin Meng wrote: > > > > +Atish > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:20 PM Alistair Francis > > wrote: > > > > > > From: Alistair Francis > > > > > > We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment fr

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-22 Thread Alistair Francis
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:41 PM Bin Meng wrote: > > +Atish > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:20 PM Alistair Francis > wrote: > > > > From: Alistair Francis > > > > We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment from the end of > > memory (or 3GB). This means we need at least 16MB of memory t

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: boot: Reduce FDT address alignment constraints

2022-06-07 Thread Bin Meng
+Atish On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:20 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > From: Alistair Francis > > We previously stored the device tree at a 16MB alignment from the end of > memory (or 3GB). This means we need at least 16MB of memory to be able > to do this. We don't actually need the FDT to be 16MB a