On 01/09/2020 11.15, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 12/08/2020 à 17:53, Thomas Huth a écrit :
>> The examples look nicer when using "::" code blocks.
>> Also mention that "-d in_asm" only outputs instructions that have not
>> been translated by the JIT layer yet.
>> And while we're at it, also add the
Le 12/08/2020 à 17:53, Thomas Huth a écrit :
> The examples look nicer when using "::" code blocks.
> Also mention that "-d in_asm" only outputs instructions that have not
> been translated by the JIT layer yet.
> And while we're at it, also add the AVR doc file to the MAINTAINERS file.
>
> Signed
Reviewed-by: Michael Rolnik
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:50 PM Richard Henderson <
richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 8/12/20 8:53 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > The examples look nicer when using "::" code blocks.
> > Also mention that "-d in_asm" only outputs instructions that have not
> > bee
On 8/12/20 8:53 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The examples look nicer when using "::" code blocks.
> Also mention that "-d in_asm" only outputs instructions that have not
> been translated by the JIT layer yet.
> And while we're at it, also add the AVR doc file to the MAINTAINERS file.
>
> Signed-off-b
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200812155304.18016-1-h...@tuxfamily.org/
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: 20200812155304.18016-1-h...@tuxfamily.org
Subject: [PATCH] docs/system/target-avr: Improve
