Thanks for you suggestion, I'd be glad to do it, I will send a new
version later.
Cheers.
On 2019/11/28 18:41, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 06:32:49PM +0800, pannengyuan wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I think it's a better way, you can implement this new function before
>> this patch.
>
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 06:32:49PM +0800, pannengyuan wrote:
> Hi,
> I think it's a better way, you can implement this new function before
> this patch.
If you want to do it, so you can send everything together, for me there's
no problem, it was just a suggestion.
If you don't have time, I can do
Hi,
I think it's a better way, you can implement this new function before
this patch.
Thanks.
On 2019/11/28 17:01, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 04:40:10PM +0800, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I don't know nbd code very well, the patch LGTM, but just a comment
> b
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 04:40:10PM +0800, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi,
I don't know nbd code very well, the patch LGTM, but just a comment
below:
> From: PanNengyuan
>
> In currently implementation there will be a memory leak when
> nbd_client_connect() returns error status. Here is an eas
