> From: Alex Bennée [mailto:alex.ben...@linaro.org]
> Pavel Dovgalyuk writes:
>
> >> From: Alex Bennée [mailto:alex.ben...@linaro.org]
> >> Pavel Dovgalyuk writes:
> >>
> >> > GDB remote protocol supports reverse debugging of the targets.
> >> > It includes 'reverse step' and 'reverse continue'
Pavel Dovgalyuk writes:
>> From: Alex Bennée [mailto:alex.ben...@linaro.org]
>> Pavel Dovgalyuk writes:
>>
>> > GDB remote protocol supports reverse debugging of the targets.
>> > It includes 'reverse step' and 'reverse continue' operations.
>> > The first one finds the previous step of the e
> From: Alex Bennée [mailto:alex.ben...@linaro.org]
> Pavel Dovgalyuk writes:
>
> > GDB remote protocol supports reverse debugging of the targets.
> > It includes 'reverse step' and 'reverse continue' operations.
> > The first one finds the previous step of the execution,
> > and the second one i
Pavel Dovgalyuk writes:
> GDB remote protocol supports reverse debugging of the targets.
> It includes 'reverse step' and 'reverse continue' operations.
> The first one finds the previous step of the execution,
> and the second one is intended to stop at the last breakpoint that
> would happen
(looping the list back in)
Pavel Dovgalyuk writes:
>> From: Alex Bennée [mailto:alex.ben...@linaro.org]
>> Pavel Dovgalyuk writes:
>>
>> >> From: Markus Armbruster [mailto:arm...@redhat.com]
>> >> Kevin Wolf writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Am 09.01.2020 um 07:13 hat Pavel Dovgalyuk geschrieben:
>> >>
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 10:27, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> Am 13.01.2020 um 11:14 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 10:07, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > In MAINTAINERS, you are listed yourself as the maintainer for
> > > record/replay. I wonder whether you shouldn't just be sending pul
Am 13.01.2020 um 11:14 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 10:07, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > In MAINTAINERS, you are listed yourself as the maintainer for
> > record/replay. I wonder whether you shouldn't just be sending pull
> > requests after getting Acked-by or Reviewed-by from t
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 10:07, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> In MAINTAINERS, you are listed yourself as the maintainer for
> record/replay. I wonder whether you shouldn't just be sending pull
> requests after getting Acked-by or Reviewed-by from the maintainers of
> other subsystems you touch.
Ideally someb
Am 13.01.2020 um 10:35 hat Pavel Dovgalyuk geschrieben:
> > From: Markus Armbruster [mailto:arm...@redhat.com]
> > Kevin Wolf writes:
> >
> > > Am 09.01.2020 um 07:13 hat Pavel Dovgalyuk geschrieben:
> > >> Ping.
> > >
> > > I think you have my Acked-by for the block-related patches in this
> > >
> From: Markus Armbruster [mailto:arm...@redhat.com]
> Kevin Wolf writes:
>
> > Am 09.01.2020 um 07:13 hat Pavel Dovgalyuk geschrieben:
> >> Ping.
> >
> > I think you have my Acked-by for the block-related patches in this
> > series now. If I missed something, please let me know.
>
> Pavel, whom
Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 09.01.2020 um 07:13 hat Pavel Dovgalyuk geschrieben:
>> Ping.
>
> I think you have my Acked-by for the block-related patches in this
> series now. If I missed something, please let me know.
Pavel, whom are you nudging to do what?
> From: Kevin Wolf [mailto:kw...@redhat.com]
> Am 09.01.2020 um 07:13 hat Pavel Dovgalyuk geschrieben:
> > Ping.
>
> I think you have my Acked-by for the block-related patches in this
> series now. If I missed something, please let me know.
Thank you.
Pavel Dovgalyuk
Am 09.01.2020 um 07:13 hat Pavel Dovgalyuk geschrieben:
> Ping.
I think you have my Acked-by for the block-related patches in this
series now. If I missed something, please let me know.
Kevin
Ping.
Pavel Dovgalyuk
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavel Dovgalyuk [mailto:pavel.dovga...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 12:46 PM
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: kw...@redhat.com; peter.mayd...@linaro.org; crosthwaite.pe...@gmail.com;
> boost.li...@gmail.com; artem.k.pis
14 matches
Mail list logo
