Mark B wrote:
> Apologies for the missed semi-colon - I edited the vendor id after the fact.
>
> Looks like I chopped the call to init as well. You'll need this:
Please post an updated (complete) patch to this mailing list.
Thiemo
___
Qemu-devel ma
f
Christian MICHON
Sent: 04 January 2007 09:53
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] USB EHCI development nearing completion
I tested it on win32 host.
Apparently a typo mistake (see updated patch)
how to use it ?
diff -Nur ehci.patch ehci-xian.patch
--- ehci.patch Thu Jan 4 09:5
I tested it on win32 host.
Apparently a typo mistake (see updated patch)
how to use it ?
diff -Nur ehci.patch ehci-xian.patch
--- ehci.patch Thu Jan 4 09:50:17 2007
+++ ehci-xian.patch Thu Jan 4 10:40:26 2007
@@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@
+printf ("buffer is %p (+%d)\n", s->buffer, (uint8_t*)
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Brook
Sent: 27 December 2006 21:34
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Mark B
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] USB EHCI development nearing completion
On Wednesday 27 December 2006 21:21, Mark B wrote:
> Thank you Fabrice and co. LGPL or BSD should be fine - I don&#x
On Wednesday 27 December 2006 21:21, Mark B wrote:
> Thank you Fabrice and co. LGPL or BSD should be fine - I don't have any
> preference on the license.
>
> I could not find the experimental 3D patch - it seems to have expired. But
> I uploaded a diff patch anyway to 4shared at this location:
>
devel@nongnu.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] USB EHCI development nearing completion
Another point is that I won't accept a GPL license for such a device.
LGPL or BSD would be better.
Regards,
Fabrice.
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Well, there aren't
Another point is that I won't accept a GPL license for such a device.
LGPL or BSD would be better.
Regards,
Fabrice.
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Hi Mark,
Well, there aren't any "written rules" but most people who contribute
sends some "proof of concept" diff'ed patch (appliable to QEMU CVS for
exam
Hi Mark,
Well, there aren't any "written rules" but most people who contribute
sends some "proof of concept" diff'ed patch (appliable to QEMU CVS for
example) (you can look at the experimental 3D patch few weeks ago),
and then the talks begins, while others would look how portable your
code to ot
