RE: [Qemu-devel] Request for Qemu bugzilla

2008-01-08 Thread Alexey Eremenko
Hi Lauro Ramos Venancio ! >I would like to volunteer me to maintain a stable branch (and eventually a bug >track) . >In 2008, I will work full time on qemu and I will need a stable version. I fully support the idea of having stable branch. Count me in, as your stable-branch BETA-tester :) -Al

Re: [Qemu-devel] Request for Qemu bugzilla

2008-01-08 Thread Lauro Ramos Venancio
> The main limiting factor is a volunteer to do the work. You can always do > an "unofficial" bugfix-only release and get it blessed later. (That's how > the Windows and MacOS X binary releases seem to work.) I would like to volunteer me to maintain a stable branch (and eventually a bug track) .

Re: [Qemu-devel] Request for Qemu bugzilla

2008-01-07 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 07 January 2008 14:38:54 Julian Seward wrote: > > [discussion about where to host a bugzilla] > > Perhaps a more important question is, is there interest in making > a stable branch, tracking bugs and producing bug-fix-only releases > from the stable branch? As is traditional in (eg) gcc

Re: [Qemu-devel] Request for Qemu bugzilla

2008-01-07 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 07.01.2008 um 21:38 schrieb Julian Seward: Perhaps a more important question is, is there interest in making a stable branch, tracking bugs and producing bug-fix-only releases from the stable branch? As is traditional in (eg) gcc, etc? If not, I don't think there is much point in having a

Re: [Qemu-devel] Request for Qemu bugzilla

2008-01-07 Thread Julian Seward
> [discussion about where to host a bugzilla] Perhaps a more important question is, is there interest in making a stable branch, tracking bugs and producing bug-fix-only releases from the stable branch? As is traditional in (eg) gcc, etc? If not, I don't think there is much point in having a b

Re: [Qemu-devel] Request for Qemu bugzilla

2008-01-06 Thread Alexey Eremenko
Well, the bugzilla doesn't have to be on the main site, but a _link_ to the "official" Qemu bugzilla should exist from the main site. -- -Alexey Eremenko "Technologov"

Re: [Qemu-devel] Request for Qemu bugzilla

2008-01-06 Thread Soren Hansen
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:56:11PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Would that be possible to add Qemu bugzilla to the main Qemu site (http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/index.html), please ? >>> While QEMU is officially still in alpha stage ;) I'd agree that an >>> issue tracking system

Re: [Qemu-devel] Request for Qemu bugzilla

2008-01-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:12:48PM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:06:28PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> I would like to be helpful, and join as a BETA tester to the Qemu > >> community. However, to be effective I need the right tools to > >> successfully accomplish my m

Re: [Qemu-devel] Request for Qemu bugzilla

2008-01-06 Thread Soren Hansen
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:06:28PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: >> I would like to be helpful, and join as a BETA tester to the Qemu >> community. However, to be effective I need the right tools to >> successfully accomplish my mission. One tool that I would really like >> to have is a Qemu bugzill

Re: [Qemu-devel] Request for Qemu bugzilla

2008-01-06 Thread Andreas Färber
Hi, Am 06.01.2008 um 19:56 schrieb Alexey Eremenko: I would like to be helpful, and join as a BETA tester to the Qemu community. However, to be effective I need the right tools to successfully accomplish my mission. One tool that I would really like to have is a Qemu bugzilla. Would that