On 4/9/25 10:27, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfcv2 03/20] HostIOMMUDevice: Introduce realize_late
callback
On 4/7/25 13:19, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 2/19/25 09:22, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
Currently we have realize() callback
>-Original Message-
>From: Cédric Le Goater
>Subject: Re: [PATCH rfcv2 03/20] HostIOMMUDevice: Introduce realize_late
>callback
>
>On 4/7/25 13:19, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 2/19/25 09:22, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>>> Currently we have realize(
On 4/7/25 13:19, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 2/19/25 09:22, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
Currently we have realize() callback which is called before attachment.
But there are still some elements e.g., hwpt_id is not ready before
attachment. So we need a realize_late() callback to further initialize
them
On 2/19/25 09:22, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
Currently we have realize() callback which is called before attachment.
But there are still some elements e.g., hwpt_id is not ready before
attachment. So we need a realize_late() callback to further initialize
them.
The relation between objects HostIOMMU
Hi Zhenzhong,
On 2/28/25 9:16 AM, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Eric Auger
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH rfcv2 03/20] HostIOMMUDevice: Introduce realize_late
>> callback
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/19/25 9:22 AM, Zhenz
>-Original Message-
>From: Eric Auger
>Subject: Re: [PATCH rfcv2 03/20] HostIOMMUDevice: Introduce realize_late
>callback
>
>
>
>
>On 2/19/25 9:22 AM, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>> Currently we have realize() callback which is called before attachment.
>
On 2/19/25 9:22 AM, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> Currently we have realize() callback which is called before attachment.
> But there are still some elements e.g., hwpt_id is not ready before
> attachment. So we need a realize_late() callback to further initialize
> them.
from the description it is n
