Taylor Simpson writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Henderson
>> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 10:38 AM
>> To: Taylor Simpson ; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
>> Subject: Re: Question about direct block chaining
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Henderson
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 10:38 AM
> To: Taylor Simpson ; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> Subject: Re: Question about direct block chaining
>
> On 4/18/22 07:54, Taylor Simpson wrote
On 4/18/22 07:54, Taylor Simpson wrote:
I implemented both approaches for inner loops and didn't see speedup in my
benchmark. So, I have a couple of questions
1) What are the pros and cons of the two approaches (lookup_and_goto_ptr and
goto_tb + exit_tb)?
goto_tb can only be used within a si
I've been working on speeding up the Hexagon target by using direct block
chaining. Due to Hexagon's VLIW packet semantics (possibly multiple branches
in a packet, not processing change-of-flow until packet commit), we have
historically treated all change-of-flow as indirect.
I looked at the d