[Note: this mail is primarily send for documentation purposes and/or for
regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot. That's why I removed
most or all folks from the list of recipients, but left any that looked
like a mailing lists. These mails usually contain '#forregzbot' in the
subject, to
On Sun, 2022-10-02 at 07:56 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 11:59:42AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 19:35 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 9/29/22 18:39, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:37:22AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
>
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 11:59:42AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 19:35 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 9/29/22 18:39, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:37:22AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > > > I am aware, and I've submitted the fix to qemu here:
On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 19:35 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 9/29/22 18:39, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:37:22AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > > I am aware, and I've submitted the fix to qemu here:
> > > >
> > > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2022
TWIMC: this mail is primarily send for documentation purposes and for
regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot. These mails usually
contain '#forregzbot' in the subject, to make them easy to spot and filter.
[TLDR: I'm adding this regression report to the list of tracked
regressions; all t
On 9/29/22 18:39, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:37:22AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
I am aware, and I've submitted the fix to qemu here:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2022-09/msg00398.html
I don't think so. Memory alignment and length granularity are t
On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 09:48 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> I am aware, and I've submitted the fix to qemu here:
>
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2022-09/msg00398.html
>
Thanks for quick response!
Question is though, isn't this an kernel ABI breakage?
(I myself don't care, I
I am aware, and I've submitted the fix to qemu here:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2022-09/msg00398.html
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:37:22AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> I don't think so. Memory alignment and length granularity are two completely
> different concepts. If anything, the kernel's ABI had been that the length
> requirement was also required for the memory alignment, not the other way
> arou
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 07:16:29PM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 09:48 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > I am aware, and I've submitted the fix to qemu here:
> >
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2022-09/msg00398.html
> >
>
>
> Thanks for quick response!
Hi!
Recently I noticed that this commit broke the boot of some of the VMs that I
run on my dev machine.
It seems that I am not the first to notice this but in my case it is a bit
different
https://lore.kernel.org/all/e0038866ac54176beeac944c9116f7a9bdec7019.ca...@linux.ibm.com/
My VM is a
11 matches
Mail list logo
